Articles Posted in Truck accidents

When a commercial truck is involved in an accident, the collision happens in seconds. The accountability fight may last months or years. One regulation often decides whether the injured person can identify the right defendants quickly enough to preserve evidence and build a clean liability story.   49 CFR 390.21T requires a self propelled commercial motor vehicle to display two core identifiers. The vehicle must show the legal name or a single trade name of the motor carrier, and it must show the motor carrier’s USDOT number with the letters “USDOT” immediately before the number. The marking must appear on both sides of the vehicle. The letters must contrast sharply with the background. The marking must remain legible from 50 feet away while the vehicle stands still. The motor carrier must keep the marking in a condition that meets those requirements.

That is not cosmetic. It is a compliance obligation that demands daily execution. A carrier needs drivers, yard staff, and maintenance staff who understand what “legible from 50 feet” means in the real world. A carrier needs inspections that catch peeling vinyl, road grime, crash damage, poorly placed decals, and box trucks that collect soot until the company name disappears. A carrier also needs procedures for leased equipment and owner operators so the truck displays the correct operating identity when the load moves.

From a personal injury perspective, the marking rule influences four high stakes issues.

In trucking cases physics matters, but evidence often decides the outcome.  The federal regulations, 49 CFR Part 390 include a set of record rules that sound administrative, but are important for trucking injury litigation.

This requirement drives operational behavior. A compliant carrier trains safety staff to maintain centralized records or at least a reliable index. A compliant carrier builds a process for pulling documents quickly from terminals, third party systems, and electronic providers. A compliant carrier also understands that records include more than paper. They include electronic images, electronic documents, and systems that must reproduce the information accurately.

A federal investigation into a fatal crash highlights why record integrity matters. The National Transportation Safety Board investigated a December 2022 rear end collision in Virginia involving a tractor trailer operated by Triton Logistics Incorporated of Romeoville, Illinois. NTSB The NTSB described how the truck traveled far faster than the bus and the driver did not brake before impact. NTSB Reporting on the NTSB findings described fictitious driver accounts in an electronic logging device system that allowed drivers to exceed hours limits, which the NTSB linked to driver fatigue.

Truck-228x300

Truck

A serious truck crash in Chicago and elsewhere can look simple in the first headlines and blame the truck driver. A few sentences, a few quotes, and the news moves on.  However our experienced trucking injury attorneys know from experience that personal injury cases rarely start and end with the driver. Federal trucking safety rules acknowledge that safety starts before the driver turns the key, and place responsibility on the trucking company to know the rules, teach the rules, and require compliance.

The federal regulation, 49 C.F.R. § 390.3 state every employer must know and comply with the safety regulations, and every driver and employee must receive instruction and comply. Additionally, 49 C.F.R. § 390.11 says that when the regulations impose a duty on a driver, the motor carrier must require the driver to follow it.

Two trucksTractor trailers do not “come out of nowhere.”  When a driver says that, it often means the truck did not appear visible enough soon enough to give them a fair chance to react.  That idea has a name in federal law. Regulators call it conspicuity. Injury lawyers translate that as “Can you see this thing in time to avoid getting killed by it?”

The personal injury trucking lawyers at Zneimer & Zneimer are well aware of the federal requirements imposed on commercial carriers to ensure their trucks and trailers are visible or conspicuous.  Federal conspicuity rules set requirements for retroreflective sheeting and reflex reflectors on trailers and semitrailers. A trailer at night behaves like a moving wall. It can blend into the darkness until headlights reach it. By then, drivers may have no time or distance left to steer or brake.  Conspicuity systems try to solve that problem by:

  • Outlining the sides and rear of the trailer with reflective material

IMG_1351-225x300IMG_1349-225x300

When people think of truck safety, they often picture brakes, tires, and driver training. Yet one of the most overlooked aspects of safety in the trucking industry lies in paperwork—specifically, recordkeeping and reporting under 49 CFR Part 40. These requirements are not red tape. They are the backbone of the drug and alcohol testing system that protects the public from impaired truck drivers.

Every trucking company has a legal duty to maintain accurate and complete testing records. Positive drug or alcohol tests, refusals to test, evaluations by a Substance Abuse Professional, and follow-up testing schedules must be kept for at least five years. Negative and canceled test results must be retained for at least one year. Employers must also preserve collection records, laboratory reports, and communications with medical review officers. These documents must be readily available to the Department of Transportation or the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration within two business days of a request.

Beyond storage, employers must report violations. If a driver refuses or fails a test, the employer is required to provide that information to state licensing authorities. This ensures that a driver who poses a safety risk cannot simply move to another company and get behind the wheel undetected. When companies fail to report, they help dangerous drivers slip through the cracks, putting the public in jeopardy.

Federal law recognizes a simple truth that if truck drivers could predict when they would be tested for drugs or alcohol, the testing system would fail. That is why 49 CFR Part 40 and related DOT rules require truly random testing of drivers in safety-sensitive positions, including those who operate tractor-trailers on public roads. Random testing is a mandatory safety tool designed to keep impaired drivers out of 80,000-pound vehicles.

Random testing must be unpredictable. Carriers cannot tip off drivers, use biased selection methods, or schedule tests for convenience. Instead, the selection process must be scientifically valid and spread throughout the year. Each driver must have an equal chance of being chosen every time names are drawn. Importantly, being tested once does not exempt a driver from being tested again in the same year. The law is structured this way to create a constant deterrent against drug and alcohol use.

When a driver is selected, the employer must act immediately. Federal rules require that drivers report for testing as soon as they are notified. Employers cannot delay or reschedule to make life easier for the driver. A delay not only undermines the deterrent effect but can also signal that a company is willing to bend the rules—an attitude that often spills into other safety violations.

IMG_2675-225x300IMG_2680-225x300

When a commercial truck driver fails a drug or alcohol test or refuses to take one, federal law does not simply allow them to get back behind the wheel the next day. Instead, the law requires a specific process to protect the public, and at the heart of this process is the Substance Abuse Professional.

Under 49 CFR Part 40, a Substance Abuse Professional is a specially credentialed professional who evaluates drivers who have violated the Department of Transportation’s drug and alcohol testing rules. Substance Abuse Professionals are not just counselors; they are federally recognized gatekeepers with the power to determine whether a driver can return to safety-sensitive duties such as operating a tractor-trailer. To qualify, an Substance Abuse Professional must be a licensed physician, psychologist, social worker, employee assistance professional, or certified drug and alcohol counselor, and must undergo DOT-approved training and testing.

Once a driver tests positive or refuses testing, the employer must immediately remove that driver from duty. At that point, the Substance Abuse Professional steps in. The Substance Abuse Professional conducts a face-to-face evaluation, determines whether the driver requires education, treatment, or both, and develops a rehabilitation plan. Only after the Substance Abuse Professional certifies that the driver has complied with these recommendations can the driver take a return-to-duty test. Even then, the process is not over. Federal rules require the Substance Abuse Professional to design a follow-up testing schedule that the employer must enforce, often lasting years and involving numerous unannounced tests.

IMG_6073-225x300IMG_6092-225x300
The truck accident lawyers of Zneimer & Zneimer P.C. recognize the devastating personal injuries that can result from trucking accidents.  To make the roads safer, truck drivers  and trucking companies are responsible for complying with the rules of the road and federal regulations.  Every truck driver who holds a commercial driver’s license (CDL) and operates in interstate commerce is subject to the Department of Transportation’s strict testing rules. These rules are not suggestions; they are federal safety mandates designed to keep impaired drivers off the road.

Drivers must undergo drug and alcohol testing in specific circumstances: before employment begins, after certain accidents, randomly during employment, when reasonable suspicion exists, and before returning to duty after a violation. Only urine and oral fluid specimens tested in HHS-certified laboratories are allowed for drug testing. Quick “instant tests,” hair testing, or unapproved methods are not authorized under federal law.

If a driver tests positive or refuses to test, federal law requires immediate removal from safety-sensitive duties such as operating a commercial vehicle. A driver cannot return to work until completing an evaluation with a Substance Abuse Professional, following prescribed treatment or education, and passing a return-to-duty test. Even after returning, the driver will face a rigorous schedule of follow-up testing for years

IMG_6074-225x300

If you have been injured in a trucking crash in Chicago or anywhere in Illinois, it is important to understand all the factors that may have contributed to the accident—including whether the driver was qualified to operate a commercial vehicle under federal law. At Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C., a leading Chicago personal injury law firm, we represent victims of serious truck crashes and fight to hold trucking companies accountable when they put unsafe or unqualified drivers on the road.

A recent federal Executive Order, issued on April 28, 2025, now requires strict enforcement of a rule that has existed for years: truck drivers must be able to speak and read English. The Department of Transportation and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) will begin placing drivers out of service if they cannot demonstrate English proficiency.

Under 49 C.F.R. § 391.11(b)(2), commercial motor vehicle drivers must be able to:

  • Read and understand road signs and warning labels

  • Converse with police and emergency personnel

  • Follow detour instructions and directions from dispatchers

  • Complete safety records and logbooks in English

The purpose of this regulation is to protect public safety, but the impact may be far-reaching. Many owner-operators and immigrant truck drivers are simply trying to earn a living and support their families. For drivers who struggle with English fluency, this new enforcement policy may result in loss of work or fines, even if they have driven safely for years.

At Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C., we believe in road safety and fairness. We also believe drivers deserve support—not just penalties. Trucking schools and community colleges should offer specialized English programs for truck drivers, focusing on the real-world vocabulary and situations they face on the road. By giving drivers the tools they need to comply, we can reduce the risk of accidents without marginalizing workers. Continue reading

Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C. is a highly respected Chicago law firm with deep experience in both personal injury and immigration law. Our attorneys regularly represent victims injured in trucking accidents, and we also assist individuals navigating the complex immigration system, including commercial drivers working under valid immigration status.   We follow closely all trucking regulations.

On April 28, 2025, the White House issued a new Executive Order requiring strict enforcement of English proficiency requirements for commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers. This move, combined with action from the Department of Transportation and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), represents a major shift in federal trucking regulation—one that directly affects the safety of Illinois highways and the liability of commercial carriers.

Under 49 C.F.R. § 391.11(b)(2), commercial drivers must be able to read and speak English well enough to converse with the public, understand highway signs and signals, respond to official inquiries, and make entries on required reports. Despite this longstanding rule, enforcement had been largely suspended since 2016. That has now changed, and we anticipate more drivers will be ordered out of service.

The Department of Transportation has rescinded the prior guidance that prohibited placing drivers out-of-service for violating the English proficiency standard. Moving forward, drivers who cannot meet the English language requirement will be deemed unqualified to operate a CMV and subject to out-of-service orders.

Trucking companies and drivers must now take proactive steps to ensure compliance with federal English proficiency standards to avoid regulatory violations, liability exposure, and out-of-service orders. Carriers should revise their hiring and training protocols to include clear assessments of a driver’s ability to read and speak English as required under 49 C.F.R. § 391.11(b)(2). This may include conducting internal language evaluations, requiring proof of English coursework or certification, and offering employer-sponsored English as a Second Language (ESL) programs. Drivers who struggle with language fluency should be encouraged to enroll in ESL classes, many of which are available through community colleges, adult education centers, or online platforms tailored to commercial driving vocabulary and real-world communication. Addressing language deficiencies not only ensures legal compliance but also promotes safer roads for all motorists. Continue reading

Contact Information